Yesterday, I was talking to a friend, and he told me how sometimes it's necessary to tell people:
"You know who I used to be. You don't know who I am today."
It made me think of something I learned my freshmen year in college. Ms. Dee, a beloved professor, taught our class about the sociology term "master status." I found the concept interesting; it made an impression.
Following the conversation with my friend, I went online, searching for definitions to explain master status as well as it was presented to me. I found a definition I really like on study.com; it read:
"Master status is a type of label that may be given to you by others you encounter in the world, or it may be the status that you personally feel is most important. It could be a part of you that is first apparent to others when they meet you, or it could be an element to your identity that others would not realize simply by looking at you. Master status shapes a person's life and can be a positive, negative, neutral, or mixed label, and it can change over time. While disability is often viewed as a master status, those with disabilities may have other areas of life that are dominant, such as being an athlete.
For some, their master status may come with a sense of prestige, the consensus from the community around them that a status is to be desired. On the other hand, when a status is seen as undesirable, the status may be stigmatized. A stigma can result from choices someone has made, such as breaking the law, or from circumstances outside of a person's control, such as illness or disability."
As I considered my friend's statement I thought about the master statuses we are ascribed based on versions of ourselves we no longer are and choices we regretted and corrected. It's a frustrating thing. I thought about statuses I've assigned people especially the negative labels.
There are people who have been clean and sober for a number of years whose master status is still dominated by "crackhead," "cokehead," "pillhead" etcetera. There are people who were unfaithful but now embrace commitment and honesty who are still considered "cheaters." There are individuals who committed crimes, served time, and actually reformed whose primary label is still "felon."
While I don't believe how others perceive us is as important as how we view ourselves, I see the obstacles that statuses, ascribed or achieved, present. Labels can hurt. They definitely have social consequences, and sometimes the impact spills over beyond the social aspect of life.
Generally speaking, I think people are cognizant of the fact that people can change and many do. I also think our experiences and observations have us jaded and skeptical about the likelihood of true and lasting transformation. I get that, but there is a caveat that you and I have to remember.
My experience with someone does not determine who he/she is and vice versa. It can and should inform how I choose to interact with him/her. It determines how much space or closeness is warranted. It is an indicator of how much I can trust him/her and what I entrust to him/her. It's revealing, but it is not be a life-long description of who he/she is.
We don't want to be naive or lack discernment. We have to be able to recognize behavior patterns and respond appropriately. We can acknowledge that a status may be accurate at a particular point in time while also understanding it may no longer be appropriate today or in the future. If everyone knew the worst thing you've ever done, what would your master status be? Would that label be an accurate description of who you are today?